"Ao longo dos anos, investimos significativamente em nossa equipe de dados de campo, com foco na produção de classificações confiáveis. Embora isso garanta a precisão de nossas classificações, não permite a escala dos milhares de projetos que os compradores estão considerando."
Para obter mais informações sobre as tendências de aquisição de créditos de carbono, leia nosso artigo"Key Takeaways for 2025". Compartilhamos cinco dicas baseadas em dados para aprimorar sua estratégia de aquisição.

Mais uma coisa: os clientes do Connect to Supply também têm acesso ao restante das ferramentas da Sylvera. Isso significa que você pode ver facilmente as classificações dos projetos e avaliar os pontos fortes de um projeto individual, adquirir créditos de carbono de qualidade e até mesmo monitorar a atividade do projeto (especialmente se você investiu no estágio de pré-emissão).
Agende uma demonstração gratuita do Sylvera para ver os recursos de compras e relatórios da nossa plataforma em ação.
If you're confused about carbon offsetting, you're not alone. Misinformation and strong opinions about offsets abound, and it can be hard to know whether offsetting is the best (or the worst) action you can take to meet your net zero climate targets and promote climate change mitigation.
But as the UN confirmed, offsets are here to stay — and Sylvera is here to help you understand how they work and how to use them most effectively to help the planet.
Este é o nosso guia definitivo sobre compensação de carbono e tem tudo o que você precisa para começar.
O que é compensação de carbono?
A carbon credit is not necessarily a carbon offset. A carbon credit only becomes a carbon offset when used for carbon offsetting, i.e. when it's retired to compensate for a company or individual's greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). But carbon credits have uses other than carbon offsetting.
To understand carbon offsetting, it helps to first understand carbon footprints.
Everything you do releases carbon into the atmosphere — whether it's a Zoom meeting, buying the team lunch, or traveling to an industry event. A carbon footprint is measured by how many tonnes of carbon dioxide your lifestyle (or, in the corporate sense, your business's operations) puts into the atmosphere.
Carbon offsets act like the reverse of a carbon footprint. These projects help to either remove greenhouse gas emissions from the atmosphere or avoid additional carbon entering the atmosphere in the future. Individuals, companies, and governments can purchase carbon credits to compensate for the impact of their direct or supply chain emissions. Basically, for every tonne of carbon emitted, they can buy an equivalent tonne of carbon that's been removed or avoided to offset their own emissions.
Créditos vs. compensações
The terms carbon credits and carbon offsets are often used interchangeably, but they're not quite the same thing.
A carbon credit represents one metric ton of carbon dioxide (CO2) avoided or removed from Earth's atmosphere. That's where the ‘carbon' in carbon offsetting comes from. It can also represent an equivalent amount of another greenhouse gas (GHG), measured in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e).
A carbon credit is not necessarily a carbon offset. A carbon credit only becomes a carbon offset when used for carbon offsetting, i.e. when it's retired to compensate for a company or individual's greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). But carbon credits have uses other than carbon offsetting.
Carbon credits are tradeable units sold by project developers. They're created to avoid, remove, or reduce carbon emissions in the Earth's atmosphere. Said carbon emissions could be created by burning fossil fuels, cutting down trees, or many other things. Each carbon credit represents one metric ton of carbon dioxide (CO2) or an equivalent GHG that is or will be avoided or removed from the atmosphere.
Como funciona a compensação de carbono?
If you're trying to achieve carbon neutrality, then your carbon offsetting process will work like this:
- A pegada de carbono é calculada: As emissões de gases de efeito estufa de uma organização, produto, serviço etc. são medidas (geralmente durante o ano civil). Idealmente, todas as emissões de todas as operações e da cadeia de valor (escopos 1, 2 e 3) serão consideradas aqui, mas nem sempre é esse o caso.
- The credits are purchased: For each metric ton of CO2e, the organization purchases one carbon credit. These carbon credits are produced by carbon removal projects that remove GHGs from the atmosphere, like tree planting projects, or carbon avoidance projects that prevent GHGs from reaching the atmosphere in the first place, like renewable energy initiatives.
- The credits are retired: The organization then “retires” or “cancels” the credits with the registry. This means that the credits cannot be traded again or claimed by anyone else, so the organization retiring the credits has the sole and permanent claim to the metric tons of Ce associated with those credits. As such, they can claim the environmental benefits as well.
If you're trying to achieve net zero, then your offsetting process will work like this:
- Calcular a pegada de carbono.
- Aggressively reduce emissions within your operations and supply chains (with a goal to reduce emissions by 90% or more by a set date). Make more ambitious emissions cuts as the date gets closer.
- Em curto prazo, compre créditos de alta qualidade para compensar quaisquer emissões residuais (mas somente para o pequeno número de emissões absolutamente inevitáveis que ainda estão sendo geradas por suas operações comerciais).
- Créditos de aposentadoria.
Tipos de compensações de carbono
There are many ways to remove carbon from the atmosphere and avoid more carbon entering the atmosphere. As such, voluntary carbon offsets fall into different categories and types.
Categorias de projetos de carbono
Broadly, carbon credit projects fall into two categories: avoidance and reduction projects, and removals projects. Avoidance projects fund activities that prevent GHG emissions that would have otherwise been emitted. Examples include nature-based projects that protect forests from deforestation, and renewable energy projects that build solar farms to eliminate reliance on fossil fuels.
There is an ongoing debate about whether avoidance or removals projects are more effective. But in reality, both are essential in the fight against climate change. According to Sylvera’s Market Intelligence, in 2025, removals credits make up 5% of carbon credit retirements. Avoidance credits make up 80% of retirements, and mixed credits (those that are categorised as sitting between both avoidance and removal) make up the remaining 15%.

Tipos de projetos de carbono
There are a number of project types in the VCMs. They all fundamentally serve to either avoid, reduce or remove emissions, but may also have additional benefits.
Nature-based solutions
REDD+ (Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation): these projects protect existing forests from both planned and unplanned deforestation. That way, the forests can continue sequestering carbon—and the carbon stored isn't released back into the atmosphere.
ARR (Afforestation, Reforestation and Revegetation): these projects increase carbon stocks by planting or assisting the natural regeneration of woody biomass. Many ARR projects happen in developing countries, but not all of them. They can happen anywhere to help offset emissions.
IFM (Improved Forest Management): these projects increase net carbon stocks or reduce GHG gas emissions through changes in existing, or business as usual (BAU), forest management practices. The avoided emissions are then turned into offset credits to be traded on the VCM.

Jurisdictional and Nested REDD+: these are REDD+ projects that ensure all forests in a national (i.e. whole country) or subnational (e.g. state or province) jurisdiction are considered when setting a baseline and monitoring deforestation to accurately measure carbon reduction.
Agricultura regenerativa: esses projetos implementam princípios agrícolas que ajudam a restaurar e reviver os ecossistemas circundantes
Projetos de carbono azul: esses projetos protegem e recuperam os ecossistemas costeiros e marinhos
Technology-based solutions
Renováveis: esses projetos adicionam energia renovável à rede, como eólica e solar
Captura direta de arprojetos que removem o carbono diretamente da atmosfera por meio de tecnologia
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): these projects capture CO2 emissions from industrial facilities and permanently store them in geological formations underground
Biochar: these projects convert agricultural waste or biomass into stable, carbon-rich char that is applied to soils for long-term carbon storage
Cookstoves: these projects distribute efficient cooking technologies that reduce fuel consumption and emissions in households relying on traditional biomass fuels

What are some examples of carbon offset projects?
Aqui estão alguns projetos de compensação de carbono bem conhecidos em todo o mundo.
Katingan Peatlands
The Katingan Peatland Restoration and Conservation Project is a popular and high-quality APD project in Indonesia. This ecosystem restoration initiative is focused on a peat swamp forest in Central Kalimantan and is managed by Indonesian company PT. Rimba Makmur Utama.
Without carbon credit funding, Katingan peatlands might not exist today, as the project area was under threat of conversion before project implementation. But thanks to the conservation project, and the country's carbon crediting program, a new forest patrol and observation team have been introduced to monitor the project and implement ecosystem restoration activities.
Projeto Guatecarbon
Project Guatecarbon's full name is Reduction of Emissions from Avoided Deforestation in the Multiple Use Zone of the Maya Biosphere Reserve in Guatemala. The Guatemalan project is valid for 30 years, during which time it plans to reduce 37 million metric tons of CO2e. It is a REDD+ project that aims to protect regional forests from unplanned deforestation by farmers and ranchers, agro-exporting companies, and oil companies.
Sem o Projeto Guatecarbon, os recursos florestais da área provavelmente teriam sido destruídos pelos fatores de desmatamento existentes, influenciando os incêndios florestais.
Orca e Mammoth, por Climeworks
The world's leading Direct-Air Carbon Capture (DAC or DACC) company is Climeworks. Climeworks runs two carbon capture projects (Orca and Mammoth) in Hellisheidi, Iceland. These direct air capture plants remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it permanently underground. To date, Climeworks has multiple well-known companies investing in its carbon removal credits, including Stripe, Microsoft, PwC, Square, and H&M.
O que são os mercados voluntários de carbono?
Carbon credits are traded on voluntary carbon markets (VCMs). Voluntary Carbon Markets are international markets that allow the sale, trade and purchase of carbon credits. Often credits are bought by emitters, including individuals and organizations, to allow them to offset their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
A compensação de carbono é regulamentada?
Unlike compliance carbon markets, VCMs are not currently regulated by a centralized authority, such as a government. However, stricter requirements around transparency are emerging. For example, the SEC's draft guidance on climate-related disclosures suggests that organizations using offsetting will have to disclose a range of information about the credits they have bought and retired, as well as what other actions they are taking to mitigate their climate impacts (particularly emission reductions). This will increase public scrutiny of climate strategies, opening up reputational risks for organizations with low ambition climate strategies.
There are also an increasing number of initiatives offering guidance to organizations wanting to use offsets most effectively. Most recently, the VCMI (Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative) published a draft code of practice outlining how to use offsetting as part of a credible climate strategy.
Como os desenvolvedores de projetos colocam os créditos no mercado?
To bring credits to the carbon market, project developers must select relevant methodology from carbon certification bodies such as Verra and the Gold Standard and be validated by an auditor. These methodologies also require projects to demonstrate quality parameters such as additionality. Then, the project can appear on a carbon registry, and after that, developers monitor the project's activities to assess how many credits a project can generate once it has officially started. This monitoring report is verified by an auditor and published on the registry alongside other project documentation, and the credits are issued.
A compensação de carbono é ruim?
Over the years, companies have been called out for greenwashing when using carbon offsets instead of prioritizing the more difficult task of reducing emissions from their business activities.
Também vimos exemplos de projetos de carbono abaixo do padrão que receberam investimentos de organizações, o que resultou em escândalos de grande repercussão. Isso deu ao mercado a reputação de ser de alto risco, mas, em última análise, destaca que, nos mercados voluntários não regulamentados, nem todos os créditos de carbono são criados da mesma forma.
"O setor teve seu quinhão de escândalos, com árvores fantasmas que não foram plantadas e projeções de linha de base que criam expectativas extremamente infladas sobre a quantidade de carbono que poderia ser economizada por meio da conservação florestal. A falta de transparência, o uso de suposições duvidosas e a auditoria deficiente dos projetos tornaram as compensações um destino para os vendedores ambulantes, e todos sofreram com isso." - Sam Gill, cofundador e presidente da Sylvera
Although carbon offsets are imperfect, they're a crucial asset in the global transition to a greener future, and for supporting the developing world at the same time.
“If we're to have a hope of preventing catastrophic global warming, offsets must be one of several tools in our arsenal,” says Sam. “While land use is currently responsible for nearly a quarter of all global emissions, with careful stewardship it could become a carbon sink—capable of removing 20 years' worth of CO2 based on 2018 levels.”
Quando os créditos de carbono de alta qualidade são usados como parte de uma estratégia climática mais ampla, alinhada com os caminhos de zero líquido e a hierarquia de mitigação, a compensação é uma ferramenta valiosa para aumentar a ação climática de curto prazo e acelerar a descarbonização global. As compensações, por si só, não resolverão a mudança climática, mas são uma ferramenta vital em nosso arsenal.
Quanto custa para compensar uma tonelada métrica de CO2?
Os mercados voluntários de carbono são mercados livres, o que significa que o preço de um crédito de carbono (1 tonelada métrica de CO2) varia muito, geralmente em paralelo à qualidade. A qualidade do crédito de carbono refere-se ao nível de confiança de que um projeto realmente evita/remove a quantidade de carbono que ele diz que faz, e que o carbono não teria sido evitado ou removido sem o seu investimento nesse projeto.
Carbon credit prices vary dramatically based on project type and quality. Right now, nature-based solutions like REDD+ projects average around $7 per credit, while ARR (afforestation, reforestation, and revegetation) projects command approximately $24, and IFM (improved forest management) credits average $16. Technology-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR) projects cost significantly more due to higher implementation costs and greater perceived durability—biochar projects average $177, while direct air capture (DAC) credits can exceed $500.
Quality ratings directly impact pricing, with buyers typically paying an additional $5 per rating band for higher-rated ARR projects and $2 per rating band for REDD+ projects. This pricing differential reflects the market's growing recognition that high-integrity credits, verified by independent agencies, deliver more reliable carbon impact and reduce the risk of greenwashing accusations.
While many companies seek out lower-priced carbon credits, thinking that purchasing more for the same amount will make more impact on the planet, the reverse is more often the case. That's why we recommend working with a partner like Sylvera to assess the quality of your carbon credits, and if necessary, invest in fewer, high-quality credits, rather than purchasing a large number of low quality credits that don't make the impact you're looking for (and, in a worst case scenario, might see your brand accused of greenwashing).
Onde a compensação de carbono se encaixa nas metas corporativas de zero líquido?
Using carbon credits has been a popular choice to help many companies achieve their climate goals, for a number of reasons. Unlike other approaches to corporate decarbonization, such as insetting, carbon credits provide an immediate way to make a climate contribution. The main work entails conducting proper due diligence to ensure you invest in high-quality projects. Rather than establishing their own projects, which can take years, companies can purchase carbon offsets virtually instantly through the voluntary carbon markets.
Os créditos de carbono também são altamente flexíveis. As empresas podem comprar compensações até a tonelada métrica individual, o que oferece oportunidades significativas para aumentar ou diminuir a escala quando necessário. As compensações podem ajudar as empresas a atingir suas metas climáticas mais rapidamente ou compensar as emissões existentes enquanto se concentram na descarbonização a longo prazo. E, por fim, a compensação dá às empresas a oportunidade de diversificar seus investimentos climáticos e se envolver com um portfólio completo de projetos com os quais se importam.
When it comes to treating carbon credits as an investment, “the most strategic players are looking at moving upstream in the value chain and trying to secure quality supply ahead of time,” says Torsten Lichtenau, Senior Partner at Bain & Company. “Carbon credits are an asset and should be treated as such on the balance sheet.”
Porém, à medida que mais empresas fizerem declarações de zero líquido, a demanda por créditos de carbono poderá facilmente superar a oferta, aumentando os custos e tornando os compromissos climáticos uma responsabilidade financeira para algumas empresas. "Os participantes mais progressistas provavelmente têm uma visão equilibrada", diz Torsten, "gerenciando a responsabilidade, mas também investindo em um ativo crescente que é necessário para que o mundo se descarbonize".
Seguir a hierarquia de mitigação
Carbon credits play a crucial role in the private sector's ability to accelerate the global transition to net zero, but only as part of a strategic mitigation hierarchy. According to the SBTi, “purchasing high-quality carbon credits in addition to reducing emissions along a science-based trajectory can play a critical role in accelerating the transition to net-zero emissions at the global level.”

This means that offsetting is just one piece of an effective climate strategy. Although carbon neutrality can be achieved simply by offsetting existing greenhouse gasses, net zero (an increasingly popular goal) requires that a company first reduce emissions as much as possible before offsetting.
What's the difference between carbon neutral and net zero? Carbon neutral organizations compensate for, or offset, their emissions each year by purchasing and then canceling carbon credits. Setting a net zero target means committing to reduce GHG emissions as much as possible (usually by at least 90%) by a target date (generally no later than 2050, to align with global climate goals) and “neutralizing” any remaining emissions with removals credits (not just reduction/avoidance credits). Read more →
Margaret Mistry, vice-presidente de mercados de carbono da Equinor, explica: "[Na Equinor] seguimos uma hierarquia de mitigação", diz Margaret. "Primeiro evitamos, depois reduzimos e só compensamos quando outras medidas são priorizadas.
At Sylvera, we recommend companies follow the mitigation hierarchy. First, avoid creating additional carbon emissions (for example, if you're hosting an event for the first time, consider doing so online). Second, reduce the emissions you're already producing (for example, invest in energy-saving appliances, switch to providers offering renewable energy, and upgrade to electric vehicles). Finally, when you've done as much as possible to avoid and reduce your company's emissions, look for high-quality carbon credits to offset the difference.
Precisamos de uma nova palavra para compensações de carbono?
The UN's COP27 report and the SBTi's Net Zero Standard recommendations on carbon offsetting echo a theme that is gaining popularity in carbon markets. Both emphasize the importance of beyond value chain mitigation (BVCM) which refers to contributing over and above the impact of your own value chains.
O que está além da mitigação da cadeia de valor?
Rather than simply calculating and then ‘offsetting' the carbon emissions of your company and its value chain, you must think about contributing outside of your own operations. How and where else can your company leave a lasting and positive environmental impact?
This is why some people talk about needing a new word to replace ‘carbon offsets'. Perhaps ‘mitigation contributions' or ‘carbon donations' would be more appropriate.
At Sylvera, we fully support BVCM, and we encourage companies to think less about ‘offsetting' their operating emissions to become net zero or carbon neutral, but rather a non-negotiable way for companies to contribute above and beyond to a healthier planet.
Como as empresas devem avaliar os créditos de carbono?
The lack of regulation in VCMs means the quality of a project and credit can vary greatly depending on variables such as carbon performance, additionality, permanence, and co-benefits. These are the defining attributes of whether a project is of high quality or not. To thoroughly assess a carbon project's performance requires a significant amount of time and resources. Without proper due diligence, you could invest in poorly designed, low quality projects, which do not achieve meaningful climate impact or even harm communities and could result in significant financial loss and, reputational damage.
“[At Equinor] we fully expect to be scrutinized on the offsets we use, and as such we've got very high thresholds for quality in terms of what kind of offsets we will use,” says Margaret Mistry. “The thresholds include how the offsets are verified, what type of projects they relate to, whether they're also addressing community co-benefits, biodiversity and so on.”
Se um crédito não representar, de forma confiável, uma tonelada métrica de emissões de CO2e evitadas ou removidas da atmosfera, ele não poderá ser reivindicado com credibilidade para compensar as emissões. É essencial que as organizações realizem a devida diligência para fazer essa afirmação com confiança.
There are four key factors to consider when conducting due diligence on carbon credits
- Desempenho do carbonoDesempenho de carbono: refere-se ao fato de um projeto de carbono relatar com precisão suas atividades de redução ou remoção de carbono. Certifique-se de que o número de créditos emitidos por um desenvolvedor de projeto reflita a mesma quantidade de carbono evitada ou removida pelo projeto.
- Adicionalidadegarante que as emissões que você está evitando ou removendo por meio de um determinado projeto não teriam sido evitadas ou removidas sem as receitas de carbono, além de quantificar o risco de crédito excessivo.
- Permanênciarefere-se ao grau de confiança de que o carbono evitado ou removido permanecerá fora da atmosfera a longo prazo.
- Co-benefíciosAlguns projetos de carbono oferecem mais do que a mitigação de emissões - eles também promovem a biodiversidade e a saúde das comunidades locais. Procure os co-benefícios sempre que possível.
Each of these factors is extremely difficult to quantify independently, and most firms won't have the tools, infrastructure, or access to the right data to do so in-house.
Our Market Intelligence helps buyers and investors avoid fragmented data with a unified view of pricing, quality, supply and demand data that enables confident decision-making in a complex market.
Como a Sylvera ajuda as empresas a investir em créditos de carbono de alto impacto
A melhor maneira de garantir que você esteja investindo em créditos de alta qualidade e alto impacto é trabalhar com um parceiro confiável como a Sylvera.
Sylvera's independent ratings platform was designed to give sustainability leaders, traders and asset managers confidence in the VCMs. Our carbon project reports are comprehensive and accessible, and can be used by sustainability teams to help educate board members and other key decision-makers about specific carbon credit investments, their potential impact, and how to best manage the risks associated with the VCMs.
With Sylvera's carbon intelligence platform, you can:
- Save time and money on due diligence, and protect your organization's reputation
- Evite investimentos ruins e oportunidades perdidas obtendo uma visão de todo o mercado e comparando qualidade e preço lado a lado
- Monitorar continuamente o desempenho e os riscos associados aos projetos de compensação de carbono
Sylvera's mission is to be a source of truth for carbon markets. We help corporate sustainability leaders, carbon traders and asset managers confidently evaluate and invest in the best carbon credits by providing comprehensive and accessible insights on carbon projects.
O que nos diferencia?
Project-type-specific frameworks: We build rigorous frameworks and production systems for every project category to accurately test project design, carbon accounting, and climate impact claims. Sylvera's frameworks are peer-reviewed by a committee of experts and carbon market stakeholders – including project developers & registries – to ensure scientific consensus. We publish our frameworks so buyers understand exactly what we test and how we do it. Read our white paper for more information.
.jpeg)
Profundidade e precisão incomparáveis: Extraímos, limpamos e organizamos os dados da documentação do projeto (PDD) e de todos os relatórios de monitoramento. Em seguida, criamos meticulosamente modelos de carbono, de força da linha de base e de adicionalidade financeira desde o início para validar as reivindicações de reduções ou remoções de emissões e avaliar a economia do projeto. Nossas avaliações de projeto são as mais abrangentes do mercado, fornecendo análise granular das principais características do projeto, visualizações de dados criteriosas e mapas interativos.
A Sylvera utiliza vários tipos de dados para treinar e executar nossos modelos de aprendizado de máquina. Cada tipo fornece dados diferentes, o que nos permite detectar recursos específicos.

Validação independente de dados: Nossos analistas especializados utilizam tecnologia avançada de aprendizado de máquina (ML), dados verificados e independentes e dados de campo proprietários para testar a precisão das emissões e reivindicações de crédito. Por exemplo, usamos modelos de ML geoespaciais líderes de mercado ao classificar soluções baseadas na natureza.
Need help investing in high-impact carbon credits? Request a demo today.



%20(1).png)
.png)
.png)
