Landfill Methane Project Ratings | Sylvera's New LFM Framework

December 15, 2025
3
min read
No items found.
Paul Budin
Ratings Framework Manager

Table of contents

Sign up to our newsletter for the latest carbon insights.

TL;DR

This new Landfill Methane Project Ratings Framework addresses critical market inconsistencies as demand grows for high-integrity methane reduction credits. Landfill methane projects capture and destroy emissions through flaring or energy generation. However, systems vary widely in effectiveness, monitoring practices are inconsistent, and crediting methodologies differ in baseline modeling and oxidation factors, creating buyer uncertainty. This framework evaluates projects across carbon accounting, baseline assessment, operational performance, and monitoring systems. The new framework has been developed by multi-disciplinary team with peer review oversight, and the first landfill methane project ratings are now available on Sylvera's platform.

Across the world, landfills are a significant and growing source of methane, a greenhouse gas that is more than 80 times more potent than CO₂ over a 20-year period. As waste volumes rise and cities expand, unmanaged landfill gas poses both environmental and health risks.

In response, an increasing number of projects are installing systems to capture, destroy, or utilize methane emissions from landfills, generating carbon credits for the avoided emissions.

But what exactly are Landfill Methane (LFM) projects, and why are they becoming so important?

What are landfill methane projects?

Landfill methane projects aim to capture methane produced from decomposing waste and either flare it (destroying it through combustion) or utilize it for energy generation. Without intervention, this methane would escape to the atmosphere and contribute significantly to global warming (27–30 times higher than CO₂).

These projects have become a central component of avoidance-based climate action. High-quality LFM projects have the potential to deliver immediate, measurable climate benefits by reducing methane emissions at scale. As climate policy increasingly targets methane reduction, understanding the quality of these projects has never been more critical.

Market potential

Methane mitigation is one of the fastest, most cost-effective levers for near-term climate impact, and the carbon market reflects this urgency.
Demand for high-integrity methane reduction credits is growing as corporates and investors seek tangible short-term climate action, and integrity initiatives are tightening expectations around monitoring and quantification.

However, the market faces challenges. Landfill gas systems vary widely in effectiveness, monitoring practices can be inconsistent, and crediting methodologies differ in how they model baselines and oxidation factors. These inconsistencies create uncertainty for buyers around the real climate impact of LFM projects.

Sylvera’s Landfill Methane Framework

To bring clarity and trust to this evolving space, Sylvera has developed a new Landfill Methane Ratings Framework.

This framework evaluates LFM projects using the same rigorous, data-driven approach that shapes the rest of Sylvera’s frameworks.

Our assessment focuses on the key drivers of climate impact for methane projects, including:

  • Carbon accounting, capturing how effectively methane is collected, destroyed, or utilized.
  • Baseline assessment, ensuring the scenario without the project is realistic and supported by evidence.
  • Operational performance, including scrutinizing uptime, monitoring systems, maintenance, and historical data, to understand the real-world impact per vintage.
  • Leakage and system-wide effects, including whether new waste practices or diversion activities create unintended emissions.
  • Additionality, evaluating financial and regulatory conditions to determine whether the project would have happened without carbon finance.

A multi-disciplinary team of internal experts and external specialists in landfill engineering, methane modeling, and carbon accounting has developed the framework. Leading scientific studies, international methane guidance, and real-world developer data inform it.

To ensure quality and trust, the framework has undergone peer reviews and oversight by an external Framework Review Committee.

Engagement with the industry

At Sylvera, collaboration is key. We work closely with biochar project developers to gather up-to-date, real-world data on project activities, life cycle assessments, and financial models. Our Assessments Team analyzes both developer-provided and public data to ensure transparency and reliability.

When developers engage in good faith, they receive their rating results with the opportunity to provide feedback. Even after publication, we stay engaged, addressing any concerns or new data within 30 days.

Landfill methane project ratings now available

With the launch of this new Framework, the first Landfill Methane Ratings are now available in the Sylvera platform. 

This marks an important milestone in bringing transparency to methane avoidance projects. Our Framework sets a new bar for evaluating methane reductions with consistency, technical rigor, and market relevance.

Already using the Sylvera platform? Just log into the platform now to explore the new Ratings in detail.

Or, if you're not using our platform yet, you can access our project catalog and ratings via the free version of the Sylvera platform here.

What are Landfill Methane Projects and why are they important for climate action?

Landfill Methane (LFM) projects capture methane produced from decomposing waste and either flare it through combustion or utilize it for energy generation. Without intervention, this methane would escape to the atmosphere, contributing significantly to global warming as methane is more than 80 times more potent than CO₂ over a 20-year period. These projects have become central to avoidance-based climate action, with high-quality LFM projects delivering immediate, measurable climate benefits by reducing methane emissions at scale as climate policy increasingly targets methane reduction.

What challenges does the Landfill Methane Project market currently face?

The LFM market faces significant inconsistencies creating buyer uncertainty around real climate impact. Landfill gas systems vary widely in effectiveness, monitoring practices can be inconsistent across projects, and crediting methodologies differ in how they model baselines and oxidation factors. These variations make it difficult for corporates and investors seeking high-integrity methane reduction credits to assess project quality. As demand grows for tangible short-term climate action and integrity initiatives tighten expectations around monitoring and quantification, addressing these challenges has become critical.

What does the Landfill Methane Project Ratings Framework evaluate?

Sylvera's framework evaluates LFM projects across five key drivers of climate impact: carbon accounting capturing how effectively methane is collected, destroyed, or utilized; baseline assessment ensuring the no-project scenario is realistic and evidence-supported; operational performance scrutinizing uptime, monitoring systems, maintenance, and historical data to understand real-world impact per vintage; leakage and system-wide effects examining whether new waste practices create unintended emissions; and additionality evaluating financial and regulatory conditions to determine whether projects would have happened without carbon finance.

Where can users access Sylvera's Landfill Methane Project Ratings?

The first Landfill Methane Project Ratings are now available on the Sylvera platform, marking an important milestone in bringing transparency to methane avoidance projects. Existing platform users can log in immediately to explore the new ratings in detail, while new users can request a demo to learn how Sylvera can support their methane reduction strategy. The framework sets a new standard for evaluating methane reductions with consistency, technical rigor, and market relevance, helping users understand which methane projects deliver real, verifiable climate impact.

About the author

Paul Budin
Ratings Framework Manager

Paul has an M.Sc. in Finance. He has worked in Project Finance on upstream oil & gas projects and infrastructure and renewable projects in different international banks across Europe, the Americas and Asia.

No items found.

Explore our market-leading end-to-end carbon data, tools and workflow solutions