How Accurate Are Above-Ground Biomass Estimates in Nature-Based Projects?

July 6, 2025
12
min read
No items found.

Table of contents

Sign up to our newsletter for the latest carbon insights.

TL;DR

Aboveground biomass estimates are needed to issue carbon credits for nature-based projects. But are these estimates accurate? The answer is... not really. Good news: Sylvera's Biomass Atlas - powered by over $10 million in proprietary Multi-Scale LiDAR field research - delivers the most accurate biomass data available. With errors below 9% at project scale and coverage from 2000-present, Biomass Atlas helps users better understand forest biomass dynamics and predict carbon sequestration capabilities. This leads to more accurate credit issuance and a real, measurable climate impact.

Many companies have embraced climate change initiatives. But do said initiatives actually remove greenhouse gases (GHGs) from the atmosphere and fight global warming?

This question has driven the need for high-integrity carbon credits.

The thing is, you can't guarantee high-integrity carbon credits without accurate forest biomass estimation models. After all, biomass estimations help predict how much carbon a nature-based project can sequester, which determines the number of carbon credits it generates.

Unfortunately, conventional biomass estimation methods, such as allometry and GEDI, fall short. That's why Sylvera developed Biomass Atlas - an innovative approach that uses proprietary multi-scale lidar data collected across 250,000+ hectares with deep ground-truthing. This leads to more accurate estimations in terms of aboveground biomass.

What does all this mean to you, the corporate buyer or investor? Accurate biomass estimations produce higher quality carbon credits, which have important market and financial implications.

Why forest aboveground biomass estimation accuracy matters in carbon markets

The term "biomass" refers to the standing dry mass, AKA dead matter, of woody plants.

It's usually expressed as a mass per unit area (e.g. Megagrams per hectare: Mg ha-1) and is used to determine the amount of carbon released and sequestered by forest ecosystems.

Put simply, we can use biomass estimations to determine the physical storage of carbon in wood. We can then use this figure to issue carbon credits for nature-based projects.

Of course, if we can't estimate forest aboveground biomass with reliable accuracy, we can't issue carbon credits for nature-based projects with reliable accuracy either. This could lead to multiple problems, such as over or under-crediting, a poor reputation in the marketplace for companies that purchase low-quality credits, and of course, likely less positive climate impact. 

The problem with allometric and satellite-only models

There are multiple ways to estimate forest biomass. Some of the more popular methods use allometric and/or satellite-only models. But these methods are inherently flawed.

For one thing, allometric and satellite-only models rely on tree diameter, height, and species data from a maximum of 4,000 trees. Most models are built on far less. Why is this a problem? Because it doesn't provide an accurate estimation of trees, which leads to poor quality credits.

Just as problematic, these models apply biased assumptions across continents. For example, 35% of GEDI training data comes from the US and Europe, but only 12% comes from Africa and only 8% from Southeast Asia and Australia. These model accuracy issues make estimation of aboveground biomass more difficult.

Furthermore, satellite lidar, like what the entire GEDI program is based on, has very low data point density. For comparison, Sylvera's modeling strategy, which uses terrestrial, drone, and helicopter technology, collects 30-15,000x as many lidar data points per m2 as GEDI. 

Biomass Atlas: Multi-scale lidar and real-world ground truthing

Sylvera's answer to these challenges is Biomass Atlas - the world's most accurate biomass data product, built on over $10 million in proprietary Multi-Scale LiDAR (MSL) field campaigns.

Unlike traditional methods, Biomass Atlas is not trained on satellite-only or third-party data. Our expert teams field-collected MSL data across 250,000+ hectares on 5 continents using three complementary lidar techniques:

- Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS): 3D-explicit modeling of individual trees at 1-hectare plots, with direct measurement of tree volume and biomass—no allometric equations required

- UAV Laser Scanning: RIEGL VUX-120 kinematic scanning at 100m altitude that upscales TLS measurements to tens of thousands of hectares while maintaining sub-meter accuracy

- Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS): Same system on helicopter at 160m altitude, providing wall-to-wall reference data at survey-grade accuracy

This approach has been validated through peer review and represents a fundamentally different methodology from legacy systems.

Where legacy models measure a maximum of 4,000 trees across 960 hectares, Biomass Atlas contains data from over 25,000 trees resulting in 450B+ highly valuable data points. The Sylvera database contains 150,000 datapoints per m2, while allometry databases only have three (height, diameter, and weight.)

The technology we use to scan trees is six times more accurate than the technology used by allometric and satellite-only models. And crucially, Biomass Atlas delivers:

- 30m resolution biomass and canopy height data

- Complete temporal coverage from 2000-present

- Annual updates (with quarterly updates starting Q1 2026)- Uncertainty estimates for every pixel

- Global wall-to-wall coverage across all forested regions

- Fast API delivery—data in hours, not months

Biomass Atlas has collected data from 80% of all NBS geographies across Africa, Latin America, Southeast Asia, and Australia, giving us an incredible foundation for accurate forest structure and aboveground biomass estimations.

Real-world validation of forest AGB estimation

So, how does this biomass data translate to real-world scenarios?

When cross-validating data in Peru, Gabon, and Mozambique, our team found that Sylvera's regional remote sensing data model was able to estimate biomass within 1.3% (Peru) and 3% (Gabon) and 2% (Mozambique) of the ground truth value. For these same areas, traditional model estimates were inaccurate by 16% (Peru), 39% (Gabon), and 17% (Mozambique).

Sylvera's AGB estimation model picked up 1.5-2.2x more carbon in the African grasslands of Mozambique than widely used models would suggest - which you can read more about in this Miombo Woodlands study.

Poor biomass estimation models costs the market

The truth is, under-informed model parameters lead to poor tropical forest biomass estimations.

When this happens, carbon credits are issued and priced incorrectly, which damages buyer trust. Even if the project developers who issued the miscredited projects had good intentions.

Over time, poor biomass estimations undermine the entire nature-based project category, which includes REDD+, ARR, IFM , and many others, making them less enticing to potential investors. This shrinks the pool of viable investments and reduces climate mitigation opportunities.

As you can see, model performance is essential. Sadly, most models aren't up to the task.

How to invest with confidence: what better data unlocks

Biomass Atlas estimates aboveground biomass with greater accuracy than any other model on the market.

Because of this, Sylvera customers can make more confident procurement decisions. After all, they have access to reliable data, which they can use to secure quality carbon credits on a consistent basis.

This benefits corporate buyers and investors in multiple ways. One, they get quality credits they can use to offset their own emissions or sell at a premium. Two, they maintain a good reputation in the marketplace because the credits they buy come from quality projects that slow the global carbon cycle. And three, they have peace of mind, knowing their actions make financial sense and improve the environment.

Whether you're a project developer seeking to secure financing faster, a registry building next-generation verification infrastructure, or a government establishing credible REDD+ baselines, Biomass Atlas provides the independent, defensible data that stakeholders demand.

Sylvera customers also benefit from post-issuance monitoring tools, so they can keep track of their investments, intervene when necessary, and maintain trust over time.

Request access to Biomass Atlas today to learn more about the world's most accurate biomass data, delivered via API in hours, not months.

In Conclusion

Not all forest aboveground biomass estimations are created equal.

This is important because data quality leads to credit quality. When you consistently buy or invest in quality carbon credits, you avoid fines and earn the public's trust.

Biomass Atlas - Sylvera's revolutionary biomass data product built on $10M+ in proprietary Multi-Scale LiDAR field research - eliminates bias, builds confidence, and drives real climate outcomes. Trusted by governments and recognized as the industry benchmark by registries like Equitable Earth Registry, it's quickly becoming the gold standard for forest biomass estimation.

Get access to Biomass Atlas now to see how accurate, defensible biomass data improves credit quality and accelerates project financing.

FAQs About Above Ground Biomass Estimation

What is above-ground biomass in carbon projects?

The term "aboveground biomass" refers to living vegetation above the soil. It includes a plant's stem or stump, bark, branches, foliage, and seeds. Aboveground mass is important to carbon projects because it can be used to predict carbon sequestration capabilities and inform carbon credit issuance.

Why is biomass estimation important for carbon credits?

By estimating forest biomass, we can predict how much carbon dioxide a collection of trees will sequester within a given period. We can then issue carbon credits based on this estimate. For example, if a reforestation project aims to sequester 1,000 tonnes of carbon over 40 years, it will generate 1,000 carbon credits over that span, since one credit equals one metric tonne of carbon dioxide. Inaccurate biomass estimations lead to over or under crediting. This hurts corporate buyers and investors who essentially don't get what they pay for. It also erodes public trust in the carbon credit system.

How is Sylvera’s lidar different from GEDI or satellite models?

Sylvera uses terrestrial, drone, and helicopter lidar technology to measure trees. This results in 30 to 15,000 more datapoints per m2 than GEDI and other satellite-based models. With access to significantly more information, Sylvera is able to provide better biomass estimations.

Can inaccurate biomass data lead to over-crediting?

Yes. Aboveground biomass data is used to predict the amount of carbon a forest will sequester over time. Said predictions are then used to issue carbon credits. If a forest's biomass is inflated, it will lead to over-crediting, which erodes trust in the system and, ultimately, harms the planet.

How can buyers or developers trust biomass estimates?

Not all biomass estimates are trustworthy because many rely on under-informed models. Sylvera's model is different because it was trained on significantly more data, which was collected in more reliable ways. For example, Sylvera has measured over 25,000 individual trees across 220,000 hectares of land using the latest terrestrial, drone, and helicopter lidar technology. This allows us to estimate aboveground biomass with incredible accuracy, earning the trust of countless organizations around the world.

About the author

This article features expertise and contributions from many specialists in their respective fields employed across our organization.

No items found.

Explore our market-leading end-to-end carbon data, tools and workflow solutions