
Buyers are shifting from REDD+ to IFM — make the move with data
Improved forest management (IFM) is the fastest-growing nature-based category, and often the first stop for buyers leaving legacy REDD+. Sylvera Ratings help you pick the IFM projects worth the premium.



.avif)




























.avif)




























.avif)

























The category buyers are moving to
IFM has grown 2.5× since 2023 and is now one of the largest sources of new supply growth in the voluntary carbon market. Much of that growth comes from buyers who moved away from REDD+ and needed a credible forestry alternative — IFM is where many of them land.
Moving categories, though, does not remove the diligence problem; it relocates it. The same questions of additionality, baseline, and permanence apply to IFM, and the answers still vary project by project.

Compliance demand is arriving
CORSIA eligibility and CCP approval for IFM (Verra VM0045) are drawing new institutional interest in 2026, particularly from airlines and energy buyers with compliance obligations. Eligibility widens the buyer pool — and raises the cost of choosing a project that later fails to hold up.
For compliance-driven procurement, an independent quality view is not a nicety; it is protection against a credit that does not do what your obligation requires.

Coverage from the earliest stage
Sylvera’s Project Catalog includes IFM Screenings at launch, giving you early-funnel coverage before a full rating is available. That means you can shortlist credible IFM projects sooner, then move to a detailed assessment as you narrow your procurement.

Questions buyers ask
IFM stands for improved forest management — projects that change how existing forests are managed (for example, extending harvest cycles) to store more carbon. It sits alongside REDD+ and ARR as a core forestry category and has become the fastest-growing of the three.
REDD+ avoids deforestation; IFM changes management of forest that stays standing either way. Many buyers moving away from REDD+ choose IFM as an alternative, but both require project-level scrutiny of baselines and additionality — IFM is not automatically higher quality.
Sylvera rates individual IFM projects on the AAA to D scale, and offers IFM Screenings in the Project Catalog for earlier-stage coverage. As with any category, projects span the full range, so the rating is what separates the strong from the weak.
Some are. CORSIA eligibility and CCP approval now apply to qualifying IFM projects (including under Verra VM0045), which is driving compliance demand. Eligibility is defined per project and methodology, so confirm status at the project level before committing.

