“Over the years we’ve invested significantly in our field data team - focusing on producing trusted ratings. While this ensures the accuracy of our Ratings, it doesn’t allow the scale across the thousands of projects that buyers are considering.”
For more information on carbon credit procurement trends, read our "Key Takeaways for 2025" article. We share five, data-backed tips to improve your procurement strategy.

One more thing: Connect to Supply customers also get access to the rest of Sylvera's tools. That means you can easily see project ratings and evaluate an individual project's strengths, procure quality carbon credits, and even monitor project activity (particularly if you’ve invested at the pre-issuance stage.)
Book a free demo of Sylvera to see our platform's procurement and reporting features in action.
Company: EcobaseÂ
Industry: Carbon project development (Improved Forest Management)Â
Region: Northern EuropeÂ
Use Case: Using Sylvera's Pre-Issuance assessment process to identify and address documentation gaps ahead of first credit issuanceÂ
Sylvera solutions used: Pre-Issuance solution, Ratings
Results: Rating of A secured, providing market confidence ahead of first issuance
‍
Background
Ecobase is a carbon project developer connecting landowners across the Nordic and Baltic region with the voluntary carbon market.Â
Its European Improved Forest Management (IFM) project - registered as Verra VCS 5315 - covers 563,000+ hectares of privately owned managed forest across Sweden, Finland, Estonia, and Latvia, making it the largest IFM project in the Nordic region and the first European project to apply the VM0003 methodology.Â
With its first issuance of approximately 900,000 credits approaching, Ecobase needed independent validation of the project's quality, and the documentation to support its claims.
The Challenge
For developers working under VM0003, demonstrating additionality requires credible, detailed data of what business-as-usual harvesting would have looked like, at the level of individual landowners. And a clear case that the project represents a genuine delivery above that baseline.Â
Data and documentation gaps in this area are a common challenge across VM0003 projects, and the kind of issue that can hold a high-quality project back from higher ratings.
When Sylvera conducted its initial Pre-Issuance assessment, the process identified specific gaps in the project data and documentation.
"VM0003 is a rigorous process, and one of the challenges is understanding what data you need to provide, and to what level of detail. Going through the Pre-Issuance assessment meant we could see where our documentation met the standard and where it didn't. The improvements we made came from having a clearer picture of what the methodology actually required of us, and where the gaps were." - Jaan Sepping, CEO, Ecobase
The Solution
Sylvera's Pre-Issuance assessment of VCS 5315 identified specific data and documentation gaps across four areas: BAU plausibility, intent to harvest, feasibility of harvest, and operational capacity.Â
These were not fundamental weaknesses in the project itself, but gaps in the data and evidence base provided to support it. Ecobase was still within its verification window, which meant there was time for the developer to act on the information delivered as a byproduct of the assessment process.
Ecobase's team worked through the eligibility criteria, added landowner-level harvest evidence, and worked the changes through with their Validation and Verification Body (VVB), AENOR.Â
This is the kind of granularity VM0003 demands. By surfacing the specific documentation requirements that needed to be met, Ecobase understood exactly what full evidence looks like under one of the market's most technically complex methodologies.
The result was a final Rating of A.
"Over the last few years, markets have told us that quality drives buyers' future commitments. The hard part is proving it before you have issued anything. An independent A rating, from an agency with no stake in whether we sell a single credit, is the strongest answer we can give, and we have it in hand before our first credit exists.” - Jaan Sepping, CEO, Ecobase
The Outcome
A rating that reflects the project's true qualityÂ
The A Rating gives Ecobase's buyers and partners the independent validation they need to engage with confidence - a rigorous, evidence-based assessment from an independent provider. At the time of writing, VCS 5315 is one of four Verra-registered IFM projects globally holding a rating of A.
Documentation that holds up to scrutinyÂ
Ecobase's project documentation now fully evidences its quality claims, a standard that will serve the project throughout its 100-year crediting period and across ongoing enrollment of new landowners and project instances.
A replicable process for VM0003 developersÂ
The improvements Ecobase made following the assessment process act as a guide to what rigorous VM0003 documentation looks like in practice, and a reference point for other IFM developers navigating the same methodology. VCS 5315 is the first European project registered under VM0003.
‍
About Ecobase
Ecobase is a carbon project developer that connects large-scale commercial landowners in the Nordic and Baltic region with the voluntary carbon market. Through an innovative project design tailored for commercial forestry, Ecobase enables landowners to treat carbon credits as a new product — accelerating the adoption of forestry practices that increase the capacity and resilience of Europe's carbon sinks.







